They say things come in threes--or is that
celebrity deaths? At any rate, the three films
set centuries ago in what is now the United
Kingdom about fights for freedom and honor
led by one incredibly noble man catalyzed by
the love of a good woman have all been
well-done works of cinematic art. "Rob Roy,"
"Braveheart" and "First Knight" were all
released within weeks of each other; though
all are thoroughly enjoyable and impressively
depicted, by now the battle scenes, the rally for
emancipation, the supremely dastardly
pillaging villain and the lush, sweeping
cinematog- raphy of medieval countrysides all
seem repetitious. But looked at on its own,
"First Knight" is a stirring, passionate
rendering of the tale of King Arthur, Lady
Guinevere, Sir Lancelot, the Knights of the
Round Table and the one brief shining
moment of the legendary city called
Camelot.
Sean Connery is excellent as Arthur, commanding, wise and benevolent, a leader to the end, with a sense of humor to boot. Julia Ormond ("Nostradamus" and "Legends of the Fall"), always regal of carriage, is exquisite as the intelligent and virtuous Guinevere, torn between the love of two incredible men. Richard Gere is the only casting misstep; his lackluster, tabula rasa performance as the dashing, heroic swordsman Lancelot doesn't bring any additional charisma or passion to the role. But fortunately the character is rich enough in itself that we are nevertheless caught up in his exciting persona. He is given additional depth with a tragic backstory. Ben Cross, while convincingly chilling as the evil, greedy Malagant suffers the most from comparison to his "Rob Roy" and "Braveheart" counterparts, Tim Roth and Patrick McGoohan, as he's not given much more to do than be consummately immoral.
As good as most of the performances are, as adrenelaine-pumping the battles, as gorgeous the cinematography, sets and costuming, "Braveheart" and "Rob Roy" told the story better, with even more rousing characters. This film, though fine, cannot help but be overshadowed by its recent predecessors. Starring Richard Gere, Sean Connery, Julia Ormond and Ben Cross. Directed by Jerry Zucker. Written by William Nicholson. Produced by Jerry Zucker and Hunt Lowry. A Columbia release. Romance/adventure. Rated PG-13 for some brutal medieval battles. Running time: 132 min.
Sean Connery is excellent as Arthur, commanding, wise and benevolent, a leader to the end, with a sense of humor to boot. Julia Ormond ("Nostradamus" and "Legends of the Fall"), always regal of carriage, is exquisite as the intelligent and virtuous Guinevere, torn between the love of two incredible men. Richard Gere is the only casting misstep; his lackluster, tabula rasa performance as the dashing, heroic swordsman Lancelot doesn't bring any additional charisma or passion to the role. But fortunately the character is rich enough in itself that we are nevertheless caught up in his exciting persona. He is given additional depth with a tragic backstory. Ben Cross, while convincingly chilling as the evil, greedy Malagant suffers the most from comparison to his "Rob Roy" and "Braveheart" counterparts, Tim Roth and Patrick McGoohan, as he's not given much more to do than be consummately immoral.
As good as most of the performances are, as adrenelaine-pumping the battles, as gorgeous the cinematography, sets and costuming, "Braveheart" and "Rob Roy" told the story better, with even more rousing characters. This film, though fine, cannot help but be overshadowed by its recent predecessors. Starring Richard Gere, Sean Connery, Julia Ormond and Ben Cross. Directed by Jerry Zucker. Written by William Nicholson. Produced by Jerry Zucker and Hunt Lowry. A Columbia release. Romance/adventure. Rated PG-13 for some brutal medieval battles. Running time: 132 min.
No comments were posted.