Gulliver should be less hate-inspiring

Gulliver's Travels (2010)

on December 22, 2010 by Pam Grady
Print

gulliverstravelsreview.pngIt's not hard to guess what attracted Jack Black to the 3D, big-screen adaptation of Jonathan Swift's satirical novel Gulliver's Travels. Where other than in Lilliput would the diminutive actor have the opportunity to tower over the 6' Billy Connolly or 6'4" Jason Segel? What's harder to gauge is just why Black, who serves as a producer on the movie as well as its star, thought turning the story into Jack Blackapalooza would be amusing. It's not. That may not be such a problem for the little kids who love the Kung Fu Panda man, but for their parents Gulliver will be a chore. Released at Christmas with the family home for the holidays, the film's deficits probably won't matter much at the multiplex. This is a film destined to make money.

At 41, Black is still playing the guy who never emotionally left middle school as Lemuel Gulliver, mailroom guy at a New York newspaper whose crush on lovely travel editor Darcy Silverman (Amanda Peet) leads him to con his way into a travel writing assignmentone that takes him to the Bermuda Triangle. The trip lands him in Lilliput, the territory of the tiny folk, where he befriends commoner Horatio (Segal) and earns the enmity of General Edward (Chris O'Dowd). He becomes court favorite of King Theodore (Connolly) and, indeed, all the land. Monuments are built in his honor and a big partyGulliverpaloozais planned. Gulliver repays their kindness by beguiling them with false tales of heroism, endangering his new friends when they come to trust his bravery.

Despite the contemporary spin, events in Lilliput hew reasonably close to Swift's tale. There's a bit of Cyrano de Bergerac thrown in as Horatio courts Princess Mary (Emily Blunt) with Gulliver's help. Segal is one of the best things about the movie. While the normally exuberant Connolly is more or less neutered playing straight man to Black, that same kind of relationship suits Segal. He is charming as the real romantic hero of the story. As for the humor, a lot of it is crude and a lot is just Black being his manic self. In both instances, the comedy tends to fall flat. A saving grace is O'Dowd as the petty, increasingly frustrated and fuming general. There are shades of Monty Python's late Graham Chapman in his delivery. His high dudgeon is something to behold, easily the most hilarious sight in Lilliput.

On a technical level, David Tattersall's cinematography is lovely. It is too bad that it is in the service of an effects-driven, 3D movie. There are moments when the CGI is only too obvious, but at least, given the material, those effects are necessary. The 3D, on the other hand, is pointless, used to no good purpose at all except for marketing at the box office. Pacing is another issue. The movie is only a shade over 90 minutes, but it is so slack that it feels much longer.
Casting Jack Black as Lemuel Gulliver was not a bad idea; what fails is the execution. The movie needed a better script than the one Joe Stillman and Nicholas Stoller delivered, one that would harness Blank's obnoxious energy to the service of the movie instead of turning it into a platform for a star's massive ego. A movie that ought to entice people to want to travel with Gulliver instead inveigles them to run from him.

Distributor: 20th Century Fox
Cast: Jack Black, Amanda Peet, Jason Segel, Billy Connolly, Emily Blunt, Chris O'Dowd, T.J. Miller and James Corden
Director: Rob Letterman
Screenwriter: Joe Stillman, Nicholas Stoller
Producer: Jack Black, Ben Cooley, John Davis and Gregory Goodman
Genre: Comedy/Fantasy
Rating: PG for brief rude humor, mild language and action.
Running time: 93 min
Release Date: December 25, 2010

 

Tags: Gregory Goodman, John Davis, Ben Cooley, Nicholas Stoller, Joe Stillman, Rob Letterman, James Corden, T.J. Miller, Chris O'Dowd, Emily Blunt, Billy Connolly, Jason Segel, Amanda Peet, Jack Black
Print

read all Reviews »


1 Comment

  • mrfilmmaven on 26 December 2010

    I have never been a great fan of Mr. Black's type of rather low brow comedy. I have found many of his role to be charachters that are too over the top. In fact I find that type of in your face comedy to be quite obnoxious and ove bearing. When he has deveated from his usual comic repretoire, and ventured into kinder, gentler roles, such as that portrayed in Shallow Hal, I have developed a whole new respect for his acting ability. I prefer my comedy to be delivered in easy to swollow doses. I do not appriciate having a loud obnoxous charachter thrown in my face. I dearly hope that Mr. Black shall continue to delve into movies that allow him to flex his acting muscles. With all that said. I would like to take the oppourtunity to wish Mr. Black the best of luck and success with all his comic (and dramatic) vengers.

What do you think?